Daily Updates

Judicial Corner : Mechanical ITC Reversal for Supplier Default  Section 16(2)(c) {Shaurya Alloys Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Another & connected matters CWP-34296-2024 (O&M) 2026 LLBiz HC(P&H) 58} (03.10.2026)

Mechanical ITC Reversal for Supplier Default  Section 16(2)(c) {Shaurya Alloys Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Another & connected matters CWP-34296-2024 (O&M) 2026 LLBiz HC(P&H) 58} Facts: A batch of 424 writ petitions was filed by purchasing dealers whose ITC was denied/reversed because their suppliers had failed to deposit GST, filed nil/short …

Judicial Corner : Mechanical ITC Reversal for Supplier Default  Section 16(2)(c) {Shaurya Alloys Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Another & connected matters CWP-34296-2024 (O&M) 2026 LLBiz HC(P&H) 58} (03.10.2026) Read More »

Judicial Corner: Refund of ITC under Inverted Duty Structure Allowed Despite Same HSN{ Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise vs. HP Cotton Casuals (P.) Ltd. [2026] 190 taxmann.com 451 (GSTAT – KOLKATA)/[2026] 117 GST 632 (GSTAT – KOLKATA)} (02.10.2026)

Refund of ITC under Inverted Duty Structure Allowed Despite Same HSN{ Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise vs. HP Cotton Casuals (P.) Ltd. [2026] 190 taxmann.com 451 (GSTAT – KOLKATA)/[2026] 117 GST 632 (GSTAT – KOLKATA)} Facts: Assessee claimed refund of unutilised ITC accumulated due to an inverted duty structure, where the tax rate on …

Judicial Corner: Refund of ITC under Inverted Duty Structure Allowed Despite Same HSN{ Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise vs. HP Cotton Casuals (P.) Ltd. [2026] 190 taxmann.com 451 (GSTAT – KOLKATA)/[2026] 117 GST 632 (GSTAT – KOLKATA)} (02.10.2026) Read More »

DGFT: The eligibility timelines under Component II of the EPM RELIEF intervention are extended up to 31st March 2027 to support Indian exporters and mitigate logistics challenges arising out of the continuing West Asia Crisis. (01.10.2026)

DGFT: The eligibility timelines under Component II of the EPM RELIEF intervention are extended up to 31st March 2027 to support Indian exporters and mitigate logistics challenges arising out of the continuing West Asia Crisis. [Notification No. 37/2026-27 dated 30.09.2026]

Judicial Corner: Additional grounds cannot be introduced before the Tribunal merely on allegations or concerns without supporting evidence or exceptional circumstances.{ Anil Kumar Singh v. M/s Agarwala’s Bitumex Private Limited APL Nos. 14/KLK/2026 & 10/KLK/2026} (28.09.2026)

Additional grounds cannot be introduced before the Tribunal merely on allegations or concerns without supporting evidence or exceptional circumstances.{ Anil Kumar Singh v. M/s Agarwala’s Bitumex Private Limited APL Nos. 14/KLK/2026 & 10/KLK/2026} Facts The Revenue sought to raise additional grounds for the first time before the GSTAT, mainly concerning the ITC availed by the …

Judicial Corner: Additional grounds cannot be introduced before the Tribunal merely on allegations or concerns without supporting evidence or exceptional circumstances.{ Anil Kumar Singh v. M/s Agarwala’s Bitumex Private Limited APL Nos. 14/KLK/2026 & 10/KLK/2026} (28.09.2026) Read More »

Customs:Common adjudicating authority is appointed for SCNs issued to Meenakshi Trading Corporation and others, with the cases assigned to the Principal Commissioner/Commissioner of Customs (Import-I), Mumbai Customs Zone-I, New Custom House, Ballard Estate, Mumbai.(24.09.2026)

Customs: Common adjudicating authority is appointed for SCNs issued to Meenakshi Trading Corporation and others, with the cases assigned to the Principal Commissioner/Commissioner of Customs (Import-I), Mumbai Customs Zone-I, New Custom House, Ballard Estate, Mumbai. (NOTIFICATION No. 77/2026 – Customs (N.T.) dated 23.09.26)

Bizsol ProfileContactUseful LinksSubscribe