Daily Updates

Income Tax: The Central Government notifies for the purposes of the income tax deduction under Section 10(46), ‘Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India’, New Delhi (PAN AAAGI0193K) (02.03.2023)

Income Tax: The Central Government notifies for the purposes of the income tax deduction under Section 10(46), ‘Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India’, New Delhi (PAN AAAGI0193K), a Board established by the Central Government, in respect of the specified income arising to that Board.   [Notification No. 09/2023- Income Tax | Dated : 01st March, …

Income Tax: The Central Government notifies for the purposes of the income tax deduction under Section 10(46), ‘Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India’, New Delhi (PAN AAAGI0193K) (02.03.2023) Read More »

Judicial Corner : High Court of Cuttack recently held that amount deposited consequent to any demand by department cannot be allowed as refund when assessee has neither produced any evidence to prove such deposit was made under protest nor made submission against such demand in Part B of Form DRC 01A; mere stating “liability is not acceptable” while paying any duty does not amount to duty paid under protest. (28.02.2023)

GST : High Court of Cuttack recently held that amount deposited consequent to any demand by department cannot be allowed as refund when assessee has neither produced any evidence to prove such deposit was made under protest nor made submission against such demand in Part B of Form DRC 01A; mere stating “liability is not …

Judicial Corner : High Court of Cuttack recently held that amount deposited consequent to any demand by department cannot be allowed as refund when assessee has neither produced any evidence to prove such deposit was made under protest nor made submission against such demand in Part B of Form DRC 01A; mere stating “liability is not acceptable” while paying any duty does not amount to duty paid under protest. (28.02.2023) Read More »

Judicial Corner : High Court of Bombay held that relevant date for computation of limitation period for refund has to be determined first and only thereafter, it can be examined as to whether limitation period for refund in a particular case stand protected by Supreme Court’s decision for excluding period from 15-3-2020 to 2-10-2021 for computing limitation period. (26.02.2023)

GST :  High Court of Bombay held that relevant date for computation of limitation period for refund has to be determined first and only thereafter, it can be examined as to whether limitation period for refund in a particular case stand protected by Supreme Court’s decision for excluding period from 15-3-2020 to 2-10-2021 for computing …

Judicial Corner : High Court of Bombay held that relevant date for computation of limitation period for refund has to be determined first and only thereafter, it can be examined as to whether limitation period for refund in a particular case stand protected by Supreme Court’s decision for excluding period from 15-3-2020 to 2-10-2021 for computing limitation period. (26.02.2023) Read More »

Judicial Corner : Hon’ble Delhi Tribunal recently held that no Service Tax can be levied on take-away/parcel food from restaurants as it would amount to sale of goods wherein, element of service such as dining facility, washing area and clearing of the tables are not involved. (Date : 27.02.2023)

SERVICE TAX :  Hon’ble Delhi Tribunal recently held that no Service Tax can be levied on take-away/parcel food from restaurants as it would amount to sale of goods wherein, element of service such as dining facility, washing area and clearing of the tables are not involved.

Bizsol ProfileContactUseful LinksSubscribe